Compare · Heap
A Heap alternative that surfaces why users churn, not just what they clicked
Short answer
Heap (now Heap by Contentsquare) is a digital insights platform known for autocapture: it records every user interaction automatically, so you can define events retroactively instead of instrumenting them up front. Its free tier covers 10,000 monthly sessions with 6 months of history and includes SSO, and the three paid tiers, Growth, Pro and Premier, are all quote-based. The billing unit is sessions, not events and not tracked users, which many write-ups get wrong. UserInsight is the alternative for teams who want the reason behind the behavior: it unifies usage with feedback, tickets, reviews and surveys, then surfaces why users churn automatically, with every insight traced to its evidence.
Heap made its name on autocapture. Instead of asking engineers to instrument every event in advance, it records interactions automatically and lets you define events after the fact, which is genuinely useful when you realize you need to analyze a flow you never tagged. Since the Contentsquare acquisition it also folds in more experience-analytics tooling. For a team that wants retroactive, no-instrumentation behavioral analytics, it is a strong option.
The reason teams look for a Heap alternative is usually one of two things. The commercial one: beyond the free tier, nothing is published, so budgeting means a sales call. The analytical one: autocapture tells you what users did in exhaustive detail, but the answer to "why did they leave?" is not in the clickstream. It is in the tickets they filed and the reviews they wrote. UserInsight is built for the team that wants the why surfaced, not reconstructed from events.
Unify · surface the why · traced to evidence
Last updated August 2026
Sample product
Ready to analyze
has signals waiting across usage, tickets and reviews. Surface the insights to see why users churn and what to build next.
Surfacing insights
AnalyzingHeadline insight
← friction step · biggest drop-off
Live, interactive · aggregate sample data
Every insight traced to its source signals · aggregate & consented · no PII exposure
Heap is a strong autocapture analytics platform for teams who want to record everything and define events retroactively. UserInsight is for teams who want the why surfaced automatically, fusing product usage with feedback, tickets, reviews and surveys, and priced transparently without a sales call.
Side by side
Heap vs UserInsight, honestly
A fair look at what each does well. Both are capable tools. Here is where they differ.
| What matters | UserInsight | Heap |
|---|---|---|
| Core model | Unifies usage, feedback, tickets, reviews and surveys in one model | Autocapture behavioral analytics with retroactive event definition |
| Getting to the why | Surfaces churn reasons and friction proactively, no query to write | You build the report or funnel to test a hypothesis against captured events |
| Qualitative voice | Reads tickets, reviews and open-text survey answers, clustered into themes | Centered on behavioral events; qualitative feedback is not the focus |
| Autocapture | Captures behavior without manual tagging, joined to the customer voice | Genuine strength: retroactive autocapture, no upfront instrumentation |
| Free tier | Free plan to try the platform on your data | 10,000 sessions a month, 6 months of history, SSO included, no support |
| Billing unit | Published plans, no volume meter to forecast | Sessions, not events or tracked users. Web sessions end after 30 min idle |
| Pricing transparency | Transparent, self-serve plans, no sales call to see a price | All three paid tiers quote-only; Growth reported from about $3,600/yr |
| Best suited for | Product, growth and CX teams who want the reason, not just the metric | Teams who want retroactive, no-instrumentation behavioral analytics |
Comparison reflects general, publicly understood positioning. Capabilities change, so check each product for the latest.
Why teams pick UserInsight
One platform that fuses behavior and voice
Behavior joined to voice
Heap captures what users do. UserInsight joins that behavior to what they say in tickets, reviews and surveys, so the number and the reason arrive together.
No query to write
Instead of building the right report to confirm a hunch, the AI proactively surfaces why users churn and where they get stuck, ranked and quantified.
Priced in the open
Transparent, self-serve plans mean you can see what it costs and try it on your own data without booking a call with sales.
How much does Heap cost?
Heap has a free tier and three paid tiers (Growth, Pro and Premier). The free plan covers up to 10,000 monthly sessions with core analytics, SSO and 6 months of data history, which is enough to evaluate the product on a small site, though it comes with no technical support. Growth adds Sense, Contentsquare's AI layer, plus unlimited users and reports, CSV exports and 12 months of history, and is reported to start around $3,600 per year.
Heap does not publish a list price for any paid tier. All three are quoted, and the bill is driven by session volume rather than events or tracked users, which is a detail many comparison pages state incorrectly. Budget for the add-ons too: session replay, heatmaps, error analysis and the Heap Connect warehouse sync are all sold separately on Pro and only become included on Premier, and retention beyond one year is an add-on on both. Get an all-in figure rather than a tier price before you compare against anything else.
What is Heap best at?
Autocapture. Heap records user interactions automatically, so you do not have to decide in advance which events to track, and you can define and analyze events retroactively once you know what you need. For teams that have been burned by discovering a flow they wanted to analyze was never instrumented, that is a real advantage, and it lowers the engineering cost of getting started.
Since becoming part of Contentsquare, Heap sits alongside broader digital-experience tooling too. The honest limit is the same as any autocapture tool: it is excellent at recording what happened and answering behavioral questions you point it at, and it is not built to tell you why people left, because that reason lives in tickets and reviews, not in the clickstream.
Heap vs UserInsight: which should you choose?
Choose Heap if the job is behavioral and you value autocapture: you want every interaction recorded, retroactive event definition, and the freedom to analyze flows you never tagged. It does that well and starts free at low volume.
Choose UserInsight if the question you keep failing to answer is why. UserInsight unifies product usage with support tickets, app reviews, in-app feedback and survey responses, then clusters the recurring themes and ties them to behavior, so a churn spike arrives with a named reason and the exact evidence behind it. Heap gives you a complete record of what users did; UserInsight gives you the conclusion about why, and prices it without a sales call.
Can you get the why from autocapture alone?
Not really, and it is worth being direct about it. Autocapture gives you an exhaustive record of what users did, which is genuinely valuable, but a clickstream is a description of behavior, not an explanation of it. You can see that 38 percent of new accounts never reach the second session; you cannot see from the events that they left because an import step silently fails on files over 10MB.
That reason is written down, just not in the analytics tool. It is in the ticket the user filed and the one-star review they left the next day. UserInsight joins those qualitative sources to the behavior automatically, clusters the recurring reasons, and quantifies each one, so the why comes with the what instead of being reconstructed by hand from a funnel.
Good questions
Heap vs UserInsight, answered
More comparisons
See how UserInsight compares
Amplitude alternative
Behavior plus the why, not just the what.
vs HotjarHotjar alternative
Unified insight across every source, privacy first, no session voyeurism.
vs MixpanelMixpanel alternative
No query required, and the qual is built in.
vs PendoPendo alternative
The unified AI why across every voice source, transparently priced.
vs DovetailDovetail alternative
Qual auto-fused with behavior, and insights that surface themselves.
vs PostHogPostHog alternative
The why, surfaced for you, without assembling the toolkit yourself.
vs FullstoryFullstory alternative
Transparent pricing, unified voice and behavior, no session voyeurism.
vs QualtricsQualtrics alternative
Survey analysis joined to product behavior, without the enterprise contract.
vs ProductboardProductboard alternative
The analysis layer that reads feedback and ties it to behavior, not just a roadmap.
vs CannyCanny alternative
Analysis across every feedback channel, not just a public voting board.
vs MedalliaMedallia alternative
Enterprise-grade experience insight without the enterprise contract.
vs ContentsquareContentsquare alternative
The why behind the behavior, across every feedback channel.
vs UserpilotUserpilot alternative
Understand why adoption is low, not just where to put the tooltip.
vs WhatfixWhatfix alternative
Know why users need the guidance, not just how to walk them through it.
vs AppcuesAppcues alternative
Understand why users stall, not just build another onboarding flow.
See why users churn with UserInsight
One platform that unifies usage, feedback, tickets, reviews and surveys, then surfaces why users churn and what to build next. Aggregate and consented, with no PII.
Unifies usage, feedback, tickets, reviews and surveys · traced to source · no PII