Analytics & behavior · Fullstory vs Quantum Metric vs Contentsquare
Fullstory vs Quantum Metric vs Contentsquare pricing: Quantum Metric pricing, Quantum Metric vs Fullstory and Glassbox vs Contentsquare on cost
Product type
Ready to analyze
has signals waiting across usage, tickets and reviews. Surface the insights to see why users churn and what to build next.
Surfacing insights
AnalyzingHeadline insight
← friction step · biggest drop-off
Live and interactive, nothing is uploaded
Every insight traced to its source signals · aggregate & consented · no PII exposure
Short answer
Fullstory and Quantum Metric publish no price, so the useful numbers are contract data. Vendr puts the median Fullstory contract at $28,240 a year across 455 purchases, and the average Quantum Metric contract at $278,579, roughly ten times more, though that figure rests on only two deals. Contentsquare is the only one of the three with published prices: a self-serve Growth plan from $49 to $739 a month, and a $170,000 12-month contract for up to 12 million page views on AWS Marketplace. Glassbox, the usual fourth quote, lists $50,000, $75,000 and from $100,000 a year on AWS. Read on 26 September 2026.
Unify · surface the why · traced to evidence
Fullstory, Quantum Metric and Contentsquare turn up on the same enterprise shortlist whenever a US retailer, bank or travel company decides it needs to see what customers actually did on the site before they abandoned. All three record sessions, all three surface struggle automatically, and all three will tell you on a sales call that price depends on your volume.
That last part is the problem. Two of the three print no price anywhere on their own sites, so most comparison pages either skip cost or repeat guesses that are years old. The numbers below come from three places: each vendor's own pricing page, the contract rates vendors set themselves on AWS Marketplace, and published procurement data from Vendr, which negotiates software contracts for buyers. We read all of them from a US connection on 25 and 26 September 2026, and we label every third-party figure as third-party.
The short version is that these are not three prices for the same thing. The typical Quantum Metric contract is about ten times the typical Fullstory contract, and Contentsquare sells both a $49 plan and a $170,000 one. Knowing which bracket you are shopping in is worth more than any feature grid.
Traced to source evidence
No PII · GDPR-friendly
Why it works
What your team gets with Fullstory vs Quantum Metric vs Contentsquare pricing
Two of the three hide the price
Fullstory and Quantum Metric both say pricing is custom and send you to sales. Contentsquare publishes a self-serve ladder and one enterprise rate on AWS Marketplace. When a vendor will not print a price, contract data from buyers is the only anchor you have going into the first call.
The contracts are ten times apart
The median Fullstory contract in Vendr data is $28,240 a year. The average Quantum Metric contract is $278,579. These tools appear on the same shortlists, but they are not bought at the same budget, and knowing which bracket you are in saves weeks of evaluation.
Every quote meters something different
Fullstory and Quantum Metric price on sessions. Contentsquare prices self-serve plans on sessions and its AWS contract on page views. Glassbox prices on sessions and seat users. Normalize the unit before you compare the number, or the cheapest quote may be the smallest allowance.
What it handles
Unified, analyzed and surfaced, automatically
UserInsight unifies your sources, reads behavior and voice together, and surfaces the churn reasons, feature requests, friction steps and themes, each traced to the signals behind it.
- What Fullstory, Quantum Metric, Contentsquare and Glassbox each publish about price, read first-party on 26 September 2026
- Published contract data for all four: medians, averages, ranges and how many deals sit behind each figure
- The Contentsquare AWS Marketplace rate and what its 24 and 36 month contracts reveal about multi-year discounts
- What happens on each platform when you go over your session allowance
- Which tool fits which budget, and what to ask for before you sign
Top churn reason
Onboarding stalls before the first project
traced to 214 tickets + a 9% drop-off at onboarding step 3
Why UserInsight
One platform that fuses behavior and voice
Not an analytics tool that only shows the what, not a feedback repository that is blind to behavior. UserInsight joins both and surfaces the why, on aggregate consented data with no PII.
Unifies every source
Usage analytics, tickets, reviews, surveys and in-app feedback come together in one model, so behavior and voice finally live in the same place.
Surfaces the why
You do not write a query and wait. UserInsight tells you why churn moved and what to build next, ranked and quantified, the moment it changes.
Traced to evidence
Every insight links back to the specific tickets, reviews and events behind it, so you can click through and trust what you act on. No black box.
At a glance
Fullstory vs Quantum Metric vs Contentsquare vs Glassbox pricing. Vendor pages and AWS Marketplace listings read first-party from a US connection on 25 and 26 September 2026. Contract figures are third-party data from Vendr and are labeled as such.
| Platform | Published price | Free tier | What it meters | Contract data (Vendr) | Over the allowance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fullstory | None. Business, Advanced and Enterprise plans, all quote only | Yes: 30,000 sessions a month, 12 months of data, up to 10 users | Monthly sessions | Median $28,240 a year, 455 purchases, $10,000 to $115,936, 19% average savings | Not published; ask for it in the order form |
| Quantum Metric | None. Enterprise plans only, custom by agreement | No | Annual session volume, digital properties and customer success level | Average $278,579 a year, top of range about $385,000, only 2 deals | Keeps collecting. Limits are set by agreement and it will not stop data at the cap |
| Contentsquare | Growth $49 to $739 a month (7,000 to 200,000 sessions). AWS Marketplace: $170,000 for 12 months, up to 12 million page views | Yes: 200,000 sessions and 10,000 replays a month, 1 project | Sessions on self-serve plans, page views on the AWS contract | Median $20,000 a year, $14,711 to $91,369 | Self-serve replay allowance is fixed per month and cannot be raised on the plan |
| Glassbox | None on glassbox.com. AWS Marketplace: Basic $50,000, Standard $75,000, Enterprise from $100,000 a year | No | Monthly sessions, seat users, and web or mobile | Median $218,809 a year, $206,500 to $280,362 | Not published |
How much does Fullstory cost?
Fullstory publishes no price for any paid plan. Its plans page lists Business, Advanced and Enterprise and asks you to customize your plan with sales. The only published number is the free plan, Fullstory Free, which includes 30,000 sessions a month, 12 months of analytics retention and up to 10 users, with session replay, basic analytics and debugging tools. Dashboards and StoryAI are paid features.
For a paid contract, the best public anchor is Vendr's dataset. It puts the median Fullstory contract at $28,240 a year, based on 455 purchases, with a range from $10,000 to $115,936 and buyers saving 19% on average against the first quote. That is a large enough sample to budget from. Vendr's own breakdown puts Business-tier deals at 50,000 to 100,000 sessions a month in the $10,000 to $25,000 range, and Advanced at 250,000 to 500,000 sessions in the $30,000 to $70,000 range.
The practical reading: if your site does under half a million sessions a month, a Fullstory quote much above $70,000 is worth pushing back on.
How much does Quantum Metric cost?
Quantum Metric does not publish a price, and unlike Fullstory it has no free plan. Its pricing page describes enterprise plans built around three value drivers: the number of digital properties you monitor, your annual session volume, and the level of customer success you want. Implementation, account setup, PII remediation and hands-on training are included in every agreement.
On contract value, Vendr lists an average Quantum Metric contract of $278,579 a year, with the top of its range at about $385,000. Read that figure carefully. Vendr says it is based on 2 completed deals from 2 purchasers, which is far too few to call typical. What it does tell you is the scale Quantum Metric sells at: its own pricing FAQ says it works with enterprises deploying across a variety of platforms and teams.
Two details on the Quantum Metric pricing page are worth taking into a negotiation. First, it will build a package without its Felix AI features if your governance team is not ready, which is a lever to take cost out of year one. Second, it states that it will not stop collecting data or make it unavailable just because you went over your session limit. Some AI features are consumption limited, so ask which ones.
How much does Contentsquare cost?
Contentsquare is the only one of the three with published prices, and it publishes two very different kinds.
The self-serve Growth plan, which is also where Hotjar pricing now leads, starts at $49 a month for 7,000 sessions and climbs through fifteen published steps to $739 a month for 200,000 sessions. Above 240,000 sessions, and on the Pro plan from 1 million sessions, pricing is by quote. There is a free plan with 200,000 sessions and 10,000 replays a month in one project.
The enterprise rate is on AWS Marketplace, in a listing sold by Contentsquare itself: $170,000 for a 12-month contract covering up to 12 million page views. The listing does not say whether the 12 million is a monthly or a whole-term figure, so confirm it before you compare it against a session-based quote.
Vendr's median Contentsquare contract is $20,000 a year, ranging from $14,711 to $91,369. That median sits far closer to the self-serve ladder than to the AWS rate, which suggests most Contentsquare buyers in that dataset are mid-market.
Contentsquare charges the same per year on a three-year contract
The AWS listing offers 12, 24 and 36 month terms, and the prices behind them are $170,000, $340,000 and $510,000. That is exactly two and three times the one-year price. There is no multi-year discount on the published rate at all.
That matters because the standard advice for enterprise software, including Vendr's own guidance on Contentsquare, is that two and three year terms bring 15 to 30% lower effective annual pricing. On the public listing they do not. If a rep offers a multi-year discount, it is coming from a private offer, which means it is negotiable, and you should get the one-year and three-year quotes side by side before you commit to the longer term.
Quantum Metric vs Fullstory: why the budgets are ten times apart
On paper the two products overlap heavily: session replay, heatmaps, journey analysis, struggle detection and AI summaries of sessions. The price gap comes from who they are built for.
Quantum Metric sells to large enterprises in retail, financial services, travel, telco and healthcare, prices on annual sessions across every property, and bundles implementation and consultation into the contract. Fullstory sells from a free plan upward and prices on monthly sessions, with a median buyer paying under $30,000.
If you are a US retailer or bank running several apps and sites with millions of sessions, you will likely get quotes from both and they may be closer than the medians suggest. If you are a SaaS company or a mid-size ecommerce brand, Quantum Metric is rarely the right budget line, and Fullstory, Contentsquare Growth or a cheaper replay tool will cover the job.
Glassbox vs Contentsquare on cost
Glassbox publishes its rates on AWS Marketplace too: Basic $50,000 a year for up to 50,000 sessions a month and 10 users, Standard $75,000 for up to 100,000 sessions and 15 users, and Enterprise from $100,000 for web and mobile together. Its Vendr median is $218,809 a year.
At 100,000 sessions a month, Glassbox Standard is $75,000 a year. Contentsquare Growth at the same volume lists at $409 a month, which is $4,908 a year. Those are not the same product. Glassbox is built for regulated industries that need tagless capture, on-premises deployment options and record keeping of what a customer saw, which is why banks and insurers pay for it. If you do not have that requirement, the gap is hard to justify.
Why the four quotes do not compare line by line
Each vendor meters something different. Fullstory and Quantum Metric price on sessions, Quantum Metric adds digital properties. Contentsquare self-serve prices on sessions with a separate replay cap, while its AWS contract prices on page views. Glassbox prices on sessions, with seat users and channel coverage as tier boundaries.
Before you put quotes side by side, pull three numbers from your own analytics: monthly sessions, pages per session, and how many sites and apps you want covered. Then ask each vendor to state the price per 1,000 sessions at your volume, the overage rule in writing, and the price at renewal. Vendors rarely volunteer the renewal number, and it is where most of the money is.
What these tools leave out
All four platforms tell you where users struggle. None of them reads the support ticket, the survey answer or the app review where the customer explains why. A replay shows someone abandoning checkout at the shipping step. The reason, a delivery date they did not like or a promo code that failed, usually sits in a ticket written the same afternoon.
UserInsight reads your support tickets, surveys and reviews next to product usage and ranks the issues driving churn and lost conversions. Some teams run it before they commit six figures to a replay contract, to find out which journeys are worth watching. You can try it on your own feedback from the tool at the top of this page.
Good questions
Questions about Fullstory vs Quantum Metric vs Contentsquare pricing
Explore more
More ways teams find the why with UserInsight
Session replay, the privacy-first way
See where users get stuck across sessions, without watching individuals.
Learn moreUser behavior analytics
Funnels and cohorts, finally paired with the reason behind them.
Learn moreAI product analytics
Analytics that surface the insight, instead of waiting for a query.
Learn moreStop guessing. See why users churn and what to build next.
Unify your usage data, feedback, tickets, reviews and surveys, and UserInsight surfaces the why, automatically. Aggregate and consented, with no PII.
Unifies usage, feedback, tickets, reviews and surveys · traced to source · no PII