Analytics & behavior · Pendo vs Heap
Pendo vs Heap pricing and Heap vs Pendo cost on monthly active users and sessions
Product type
Ready to analyze
has signals waiting across usage, tickets and reviews. Surface the insights to see why users churn and what to build next.
Surfacing insights
AnalyzingHeadline insight
← friction step ยท biggest drop-off
Live and interactive, nothing is uploaded
Every insight traced to its source signals · aggregate & consented · no PII exposure
Short answer
Neither Pendo nor Heap prints a paid price. Pendo meters monthly active users, so the number of sessions does not change its price, while Heap meters sessions, so a heavily used app costs more. Pendo Free covers 500 monthly active users, Heap Free 10,000 sessions, and the two are equal when an average user logs 20 sessions a month. Vendr reports median contracts of $48,500 a year for Pendo and $41,220 for Heap.
Unify · surface the why · traced to evidence
Pendo and Heap end up on the same shortlist for a simple reason. Both promise retroactive product analytics: install one snippet, capture behavior automatically, and define the events you care about later instead of waiting on engineering. Where they split is what you buy on top. Pendo is built around in-app guides, feedback and adoption. Heap is built around analysis, with replay and heatmaps sold on the side.
That split shows up in the bill, but not in the way most comparison pages describe. Neither vendor prints a paid price, so the usual articles fall back on old figures, and several still quote a Pendo Starter plan that no longer exists or say Heap bills on monthly tracked users. Heap's own page quotes on sessions.
So we read both pricing pages from a US connection on 7 October 2026, including the plan tables, the add-on tiles and the FAQ under them. The facts below come from those pages. Where we quote a contract value, it comes from Vendr, a procurement service that publishes anonymized purchase data, or from Heap's own AWS Marketplace listing, and we say which.
Traced to source evidence
No PII · GDPR-friendly
Why it works
What your team gets with Pendo vs Heap pricing
Two different meters
Pendo counts unique visitors active in the last 30 days and says sessions and the number of apps do not affect price. Heap counts sessions, with a 30-minute timeout on web and 5 minutes on mobile. The same product can be cheap on one meter and expensive on the other.
The free plans cross at 20 sessions per user
Pendo Free covers 500 monthly active users. Heap Free covers 10,000 sessions a month. Divide one by the other and the plans are the same size when your average user logs 20 sessions a month. Above that, Pendo Free goes further. Below it, Heap Free does.
Pendo median is about 18 percent higher
Vendr reports a median of $48,500 a year for Pendo across 585 purchases and $41,220 for Heap across 191. Heap's own AWS Marketplace listing prices a 12-month contract at $100,000, the only dollar figure either vendor publishes.
What it handles
Unified, analyzed and surfaced, automatically
UserInsight unifies your sources, reads behavior and voice together, and surfaces the churn reasons, feature requests, friction steps and themes, each traced to the signals behind it.
- Both pricing pages read from a US connection on 7 October 2026, including the plan tables, add-on tiles and FAQ
- The MAU meter and the session meter side by side, with the break-even point worked out
- Which features each vendor sells as an add-on, so the base quote is not the whole bill
- What happens when you go over your plan on each side, which is opposite
- Reported contract figures from Vendr and AWS Marketplace, labeled as third-party or channel prices
Top churn reason
Onboarding stalls before the first project
traced to 214 tickets + a 9% drop-off at onboarding step 3
Why UserInsight
One platform that fuses behavior and voice
Not an analytics tool that only shows the what, not a feedback repository that is blind to behavior. UserInsight joins both and surfaces the why, on aggregate consented data with no PII.
Unifies every source
Usage analytics, tickets, reviews, surveys and in-app feedback come together in one model, so behavior and voice finally live in the same place.
Surfaces the why
You do not write a query and wait. UserInsight tells you why churn moved and what to build next, ranked and quantified, the moment it changes.
Traced to evidence
Every insight links back to the specific tickets, reviews and events behind it, so you can click through and trust what you act on. No black box.
At a glance
Pendo vs Heap pricing by plan feature. Plan facts from pendo.io/pricing and heap.io/pricing, read from a US connection on 7 October 2026. Contract figures are third-party data from Vendr and Heap's AWS Marketplace listing, not list prices on either vendor's site.
| What you compare | Pendo | Heap |
|---|---|---|
| What the price is metered on | Monthly active users, unique visitors active in the last 30 calendar days | Sessions, ending after 30 minutes of inactivity on web and 5 minutes on mobile |
| Free plan | 500 monthly active users, analytics, in-app guides, Pendo-branded NPS and roadmaps, unlimited app keys, no support | 10,000 sessions a month, core charts, 6 months of history, SSO, 1 project |
| Paid plans | Base, Core and Ultimate, all Request pricing on custom MAU volume | Growth (estimate after installing the snippet), Pro and Premier on custom session pricing |
| Session replay | Add-on on Base, included from Core up | Add-on on Pro and Premier only, unavailable on Free and Growth |
| NPS and surveys | Included on Free (Pendo-branded) and Ultimate, add-on on Base and Core | Not part of the plans |
| Going over the limit | Paid plans keep running and a rep calls about the contract. Free stops new guides, NPS and segments | Data keeps flowing, but you must upgrade before you can view it again |
| Median contract (Vendr) | $48,500 a year, 585 purchases, range $18,500 to $151,135, 12 percent average saving | $41,220 a year, 191 purchases, range $13,000 to $154,798, 21 percent average saving |
Pendo vs Heap pricing meters compared
This is the part of the comparison that decides the bill, and almost nobody spells it out. Pendo prices on monthly active users, which its FAQ defines as unique visitors who were active in your app over the last 30 calendar days. The same FAQ says the number of applications you instrument and the number of sessions they generate do not affect your price.
Heap prices on sessions. Its pricing FAQ says a web session ends after 30 minutes of pageview inactivity and a mobile session after 5 minutes. Every return visit after that gap is a new session on the meter.
The practical difference is engagement. A B2B tool where 2,000 people log in most working days can easily generate 40,000 sessions a month. On Pendo that is still 2,000 monthly active users. On Heap it is 40,000 sessions. A consumer app where 50,000 people visit once or twice a month looks the other way around: 50,000 users on Pendo, perhaps 75,000 sessions on Heap, and the per-user cost of the session meter is far lower. Mobile apps push the session count up further because of the 5-minute timeout.
Pendo vs Heap free plans compared
Both vendors publish their free plans in full, and they look very different until you convert them to the same unit. Pendo Free covers 500 monthly active users with product analytics, in-app guides, Pendo-branded roadmaps, Pendo-branded NPS surveys and unlimited web and mobile app keys. It has no session replay, no product discovery, no orchestration and no support.
Heap Free covers up to 10,000 sessions a month with core analytics charts, 6 months of data history, single sign-on and one project. It has no session replay, no heatmaps and no error analysis.
Divide 10,000 sessions by 500 users and you get 20. If your average active user logs 20 sessions a month, the two free plans cover the same audience. If your users come back more often than that, which is typical for a work tool used daily, Pendo Free covers more of them. If they visit a handful of times a month, Heap Free does. Pendo Free also includes NPS and guides, which Heap does not sell at all. Heap Free includes SSO, which Pendo keeps for paid plans.
Heap vs Pendo pricing on paid plans
Above the free tier neither vendor publishes a figure. Pendo sells Base, Core and Ultimate, each marked Request pricing on custom MAU volume, plus Novus, which it labels a free beta with no MAU limit during the beta. Heap sells Growth, which shows an estimate only after you sign up and install the snippet, and Pro and Premier on custom session pricing.
The best public anchors are third-party. Vendr reports a median Pendo contract of $48,500 a year with a range of $18,500 to $151,135 and an average negotiated saving of 12 percent. For Heap it reports a median of $41,220, a range of $13,000 to $154,798 and an average saving of 21 percent. Both Vendr pages print two different deal counts, 276 and 585 for Pendo, 136 and 191 for Heap. The larger number is the purchase count behind the median.
Heap is the only one of the two with a marketplace price. Its AWS Marketplace listing has a single 12-month contract dimension at $100,000 and notes that usage is measured around sessions and pricing is custom. Treat it as a channel list price for a large deployment, not as what a small team pays.
Is Pendo cheaper than Heap?
On reported medians, no. The median Pendo contract is about $7,300 a year higher than the median Heap contract, roughly 18 percent more, and Pendo's buyers also negotiate less off the first quote, 12 percent against 21 percent on average.
Two things keep that from being the whole answer. A median mixes company sizes, so it does not tell you what your own volume will cost. And the meters reward different products. A daily-use B2B app with a few thousand users usually looks better on Pendo's MAU meter than on Heap's session meter, because every extra visit is free on Pendo. A broad consumer audience with low repeat use usually looks better on Heap. Get both quotes on your real numbers: monthly active users for Pendo, monthly sessions for Heap, measured over the same month.
What each vendor sells as an add-on
Pendo's add-ons depend on the tier. On Base, session replay, product discovery, sentiment (NPS, PMF and CSAT surveys) and orchestration are all add-ons. Core includes session replay and leaves the other three as add-ons. Ultimate includes everything, including Listen and Data Sync. Pendo's AI assistant, Leo, is included on every plan, while Predict and Agent Analytics are sold as AI add-ons, the latter with a free prompt allowance.
One detail matters for small teams. Pendo Free includes Pendo-branded NPS, but Base and Core sell sentiment as an add-on. Moving from Free to Base can mean paying again for a survey capability you already had.
Heap's add-ons sit on the replay side. Session replay, heatmaps and error analysis are add-ons on Pro and Premier and unavailable on Free and Growth. Heap Connect, its warehouse sync, and Activate are add-ons on Pro and included on Premier. Data history past the first year is an add-on on Pro, up to three years. Heap's own page also disagrees with itself on Pro environments: the plan table says 3, the add-on tile says 2 are included.
What happens when you go over the limit
The two vendors handle overage in opposite ways. Pendo says paid plans keep working when you exceed your MAU allowance, and a representative contacts you about adjusting the contract. On Free, you cannot create new guides, NPS surveys or segments until you upgrade, but existing ones keep running.
Heap says it will not drop or throttle data when you go over your session allowance, but you must upgrade before you can view your data again. Collection continues and analysis stops. For a team that relies on daily dashboards, that is the more disruptive rule, and it is worth asking how much notice you get before the lock applies.
Which tool wins for which team
Pendo wins when the job is changing behavior inside the product, not only measuring it. Product and customer success teams that want in-app guides, onboarding flows, NPS and a feedback portal on one MAU-priced contract get more from Pendo, and the MAU meter is kind to apps people use every day.
Heap wins when the job is analysis. A product or growth team that wants to define events after the fact, build funnels and retention charts without engineering help, and sync behavioral data into a warehouse gets more from Heap, and the session meter is kind to large audiences with light repeat use.
If you also need session replay, price it explicitly on both sides. It is an add-on on Pendo Base and on every Heap plan that offers it.
The question neither tool answers
Both tools tell you what users did inside the product. Neither tells you which complaint is costing you customers, because that answer sits in the support tickets, survey comments, feature requests and app reviews that arrive alongside the behavior.
That is the gap UserInsight fills. It pulls usage, feedback, tickets and reviews into one place, groups what customers say into themes, counts the accounts behind each theme and ties it to churn, starting at $119.50 a month billed annually. Many teams run it next to Pendo or Heap rather than instead of them.
Good questions
Questions about Pendo vs Heap pricing
Explore more
More ways teams find the why with UserInsight
Session replay, the privacy-first way
See where users get stuck across sessions, without watching individuals.
Learn moreUser behavior analytics
Funnels and cohorts, finally paired with the reason behind them.
Learn moreAI product analytics
Analytics that surface the insight, instead of waiting for a query.
Learn moreStop guessing. See why users churn and what to build next.
Unify your usage data, feedback, tickets, reviews and surveys, and UserInsight surfaces the why, automatically. Aggregate and consented, with no PII.
Unifies usage, feedback, tickets, reviews and surveys · traced to source · no PII